Ryzen 7000 Testing

Side-by-side comparison of UPSB (Upstream Bridge)

ALPINE RIDGEMAPLE RIDGE
C: 
       OperationRegion (UPSM, SystemMemory, MMBA (0x02), 0x0550)
        Field (UPSM, DWordAcc, NoLock, Preserve)
        {
            UPVD,   32,
            UP04,   8,
            Offset (0x08),
            CLRD,   32,
            Offset (0x18),
            UP18,   8,
            UP19,   8,
            UP1A,   8,
            Offset (0x1C),
            UP1C,   16,
            Offset (0x20),
            UP20,   32,
            UP24,   32,
            UP28,   32,
            UP2C,   32,
            Offset (0xD2),
                ,   11,
            UPLT,   1,
            Offset (0xD4),
            Offset (0x544),
            UPMB,   1,
            Offset (0x548),
            T2PR,   32,
            P2TR,   32
        }
C: 
            OperationRegion (PXVD, SystemMemory, Local0, 0x0600)
            Field (PXVD, ByteAcc, NoLock, Preserve)
            {
                VEDI,   32,
                UP04,   8,
                Offset (0x08),
                UP08,   32,
                UP0C,   8,
                Offset (0x18),
                UP18,   8,
                UP19,   8,
                UP1A,   8,
                Offset (0x1C),
                UP1C,   8,
                UP1D,   8,
                Offset (0x20),
                UP20,   16,
                UP22,   16,
                UP24,   16,
                UP26,   16,
                UP28,   32,
                UP2C,   32,
                Offset (0x50),
                UP50,   8,
                Offset (0x5F8),
                U5F8,   32
            }


Side-by-side comparison of DSB0 (Downstream Bridge)

ALPINE RIDGEMAPLE RIDGE
C: 
        OperationRegion (DNSM, SystemMemory, MMBA (0x03), 0xD4)
        Field (DNSM, DWordAcc, NoLock, Preserve)
        {
            DPVD,   32,
            DP04,   8,
            Offset (0x18),
            DP18,   8,
            DP19,   8,
            DP1A,   8,
            Offset (0x1C),
            DP1C,   16,
            Offset (0x20),
            DP20,   32,
            DP24,   32,
            DP28,   32,
            DP2C,   32,
            Offset (0xD2),
                ,   11,
            DPLT,   1,
            Offset (0xD4)
        }
C: 
            Local1 = MMTC ()
            OperationRegion (D0FG, SystemMemory, Local1, 0x0600)
            Field (D0FG, ByteAcc, NoLock, Preserve)
            {
                Offset (0x04),
                D004,   8,
                Offset (0x0C),
                D00C,   8,
                Offset (0x18),
                D018,   8,
                D019,   8,
                D01A,   8,
                Offset (0x1C),
                D01C,   8,
                D01D,   8,
                Offset (0x20),
                D020,   16,
                D022,   16,
                D024,   16,
                D026,   16,
                D028,   32,
                D02C,   32,
                Offset (0x50),
                D050,   8,
                Offset (0x5F8),
                D5F8,   32
            }


Side-by-side comparison of NHI (Native Host Interface)

ALPINE RIDGEMAPLE RIDGE
C: 
        OperationRegion (NHIM, SystemMemory, MMBA (0x07), 0x40)
        Field (NHIM, DWordAcc, NoLock, Preserve)
        {
            NH00,   32,
            NH04,   8,
            Offset (0x10),
            NH10,   32,
            NH14,   32
        }
C: 
                    OperationRegion (HSFG, SystemMemory, Local6, 0x30)
                    Field (HSFG, ByteAcc, NoLock, Preserve)
                    {
                        Offset (0x04),
                        HS04,   8,
                        Offset (0x0C),
                        HS0C,   8,
                        Offset (0x10),
                        HS10,   32,
                        HS14,   32
                    }
 
  • Like
Reactions: fabiosun
Galve2000 said:
What are you using to test Thunderbolt?

are you using the Hero motherboard or the Creator? (or both, like me?)
Click to expand...
I’m using the Creator. Tested using an external HDD and a 10g Ethernet to thunderbolt adapter from QNAP
 
so I canibalized my X570 Creator Time Machine NVME to test Thunderbolt on the X670E Hero and the results were excellent -- 2700 MB/s sequential read/write speeds.. not too shabby.

my next order of business is swapping out the 6900XTX in my X570 and putting it in my X670E hero build. the 665X0 will go into my X570 Creator.

I think I'm going to wait to populate the top NVME slot of the Hero until a PCI 5.0 NVME comes out.
 
Last edited:
1676312325647.png
 
1676313114097.png

Pioneer BD Recorder is here in this new RC :) :)
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: pbs888, agent2, Galve2000 and 4 others

Attachments

Screenshot 2023-02-16 at 19.29.46.png

IMG_3610.jpg

We miss a patch in new beta!
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Reactions: CaseySJ and ManuelB
  • Like
Reactions: etorix and ExtremeXT
Has anyone managed to do this or knows what the problem is
 
Send the updated kernel over please :)
 
have you guys noticed a hit in graphics performance between Monterey and Ventura on ATi 5000 and 6000 series graphics cards?

I have been too lazy to switch my 6900XTX from my Ventura build (5950X) to my Monterey build (7950X) to properly test. but i'm wondering what your experiences are.
 
Shaneee said:
Send the updated kernel over please :)
Click to expand...
In which location is the new one? (I mean in an AMD system which locks in macOS Installer icon)
 
Last edited:
Code: 
fffff80004c274b  movl  %r14d, %esi
ffffff80004c274e  xorl  %eax, %eax
ffffff80004c2750  callq  _kprintf
ffffff80004c2755  jmp  0xffffff80004c2764
ffffff80004c2757  movl  %r14d, 0x9adb7e(%rip)
ffffff80004c275e  movl  %ebx, 0x9adb74(%rip)
ffffff80004c2764  leaq  0x6a316c(%rip), %rdi            ## literal pool for: "GenuineIntel"
ffffff80004c276b  leaq  0x9ad98e(%rip), %rsi
ffffff80004c2772  movl  $0x10, %edx
ffffff80004c2777  callq  _strncmp
ffffff80004c277c  testl  %eax, %eax
ffffff80004c277e  jne  0xffffff80004c2a84
ffffff80004c2784  xorl  %edx, %edx
ffffff80004c2786  movb  $0x1, %bl
ffffff80004c2788  cmpb  $0x6, 0x9ad9bd(%rip)
ffffff80004c278f  jne  0xffffff80004c2804
ffffff80004c2791  movb  0x9ad9b6(%rip), %al
ffffff80004c2797  addb  $0x72, %al
ffffff80004c2799  cmpb  $-0x10, %al
ffffff80004c279b  ja  0xffffff80004c2804
ffffff80004c279d  movzbl  %al, %eax
ffffff80004c27a0  leaq  0x2fd(%rip), %rcx
ffffff80004c27a7  movslq  (%rcx,%rax,4), %rax
ffffff80004c27ab  addq  %rcx, %rax
ffffff80004c27ae  jmpq  *%rax

and this is the part of new kernel were GenuinIntel is named
 
otool -tV kernel > ~/Documents/kernelnew.txt

if you dont know what you are doing dont do nothing only to have fun to see how a kernel patch could born! :)

edit (added the teacher)
Sep 13, 2016
 

Attachments

  • Like
Reactions: ExtremeXT
Hello, everyone, I'm currently planning a hackintosh consisting of ryzen 7000.

I work as a sound designer for a game company, and I use Avid Protools.

After a lot of searching, Waves confirmed that it was resolved, but I couldn't find any writing that Protools was working properly. Is the Protools video engine running in Bigsur and Monterey?

(I understand that you use QuickTime Player.)
 
rexxver said:
Hello, everyone, I'm currently planning a hackintosh consisting of ryzen 7000.

I work as a sound designer for a game company, and I use Avid Protools.

After a lot of searching, Waves confirmed that it was resolved, but I couldn't find any writing that Protools was working properly. Is the Protools video engine running in Bigsur and Monterey?

(I understand that you use QuickTime Player.)
Click to expand...
Hello @rexxver,

I can download and test the 30-day trial of Pro Tools from Avid's website. Because I'm not familiar with the app, feel free to:
  • Describe any specific tests to be run
  • Provide any sample Pro Tools project to check
Update: Software installed on Asus X670E Gene with Ryzen 7 7700X

Screenshot 2023-02-18 at 11.21.51 AM.png

Screenshot 2023-02-18 at 11.23.30 AM.png
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Wow
Reactions: centraljava, Galve2000 and rexxver
If I'm not mistaken, the issue with ProTools and Ryzentoshes is the same as for Photoshop or Lightroom: Some AVX-512 accelerated functions do not correctly detect the processor abilities and fail or crash the software on Zen 3 and earlier. But Zen 4 has AVX-512.
The question is then: How do we test if AVX-512 works properly? Which test is known to crash ProTools on Zen 3?
 
  • Like
Reactions: rexxver
etorix said:
and Ryzentoshes is the same as for Photoshop or Lightroom: Some AVX-512 accelerated
Click to expand...
If problem is this it is easily solved with AMDFriend script
Adobe photoshop with this has no problem at all and also camera tracking stabilizer and liquify option and all filters on adobe suite
 
Has someone tried to run Photoshop/Lightroom on a Zen 4 hackintosh without any software patches, AMDFriend or other?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks some useful and important features of our website. For the best possible site experience please take a moment to disable your AdBlocker.