Unfortunately not, I have reported the fault to the Dev of the kext and he's acknowledged it so we will just have to wait for him or somebody smart enough to fix kext I'm afraid.Looks like SmallTreeIntel82576.kext is broken in beta 1. Does anybody know a workaround?
Looks like SmallTreeIntel82576.kext is broken in beta 1. Does anybody know a workaround?
They are on the horizon and getting closerwhere are the new patches:inseguro:
They are on the horizon and getting closer
No joy with the small tree kext no. My X570-E also has a Realtek 2.5gb Ethernet port using the LucyRTL8125Ethernet.kext and that is fine so I’m just using that port for now.How’s your Ethernet? Any joy with beta 2 or 3?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
No joy with the small tree kext no. My X570-E also has a Realtek 2.5gb Ethernet port using the LucyRTL8125Ethernet.kext and that is fine so I’m just using that port for now.
Getting the small tree kext fixed might be a problem as khronokernel doesn’t have any hardware using that Ethernet port or kext anymore so unless he fixes it blind or somebody else steps up that kext could be dead in the water.
We shall see.
I wish I could investigate and fix that kext myself but I don’t have the smarts to do it or you could say I’m too thick to attempt something like that.
I've been working on a SmallTree modification; it seems close. Shown in the attached image is how the modified SmallTree kext binds to the proper site in the left side (IORE) and how the port is now recognized in HackCheck app (upper right), but the port is inactive in Network Utility app (lower right).
Meanwhile, the Aquantia port works with a new patch for Monterey. Also, I've gotten BT and Wifi to work on ß1, and so AirDrop works as well with ß1 as I reported on a TRX40 thread on the macOS86 forum.
But I've only been able to test the modified SmallTree on my TRX40 mobo under ß1 (as I'm too lowly and undeserving of patches for anything > ß1 ).
Once I get patches for ß3, and if it works, I'll share the modified kext. The kext is currently being tested together with a custom SSDT file. (There's another avenue of approach to the problem, but I don't want to bother with it until I see if ß1 is the problem.)
BA 06
. Although use a USB with a clone of your EFI to test.@Ploddles If the PR is accepted then we will most likely provide a build until 0.7.2 release. Until then you can update the patches in the repo as I updated one earlier. Remove any patch relating to cores. There's a few and make your own patch based on the OC PR. I'll give you a hint on the replace A 6 core system replace for Monterey startsBA 06
. Although use a USB with a clone of your EFI to test.
The change you made 11 hours ago is that for beta 2/3 patches?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Don't set cpuid_cores_per_package
Skip _cpuid_cores_per_package test
jmp to calculations and set cpuid_cores_per_package
cores and threads calculations
cores and logicals count < For 10.13
Comment: Force cpuid_cores_per_package
Base: _cpuid_set_info
Find: C1E81A000000
Mask: FFFDFF000000
Replace: BA CoreCount 00000090
ReplaceMask: FFFFFFFFFFFF