I didnt follow the instruction above, yet I managed to update to 14.4.1. However I have several issues: Aquantia NIC stopped working but Intel gigabit ethernet is working.
Broadcom WiFi/BT stopped working despite Opencore legacy patcher.
I ran into that installer behavior when I booted to Ventura while Sonoma MacOS Installer boot option was available (had to make quick changes to OC config).
The problem went away by having Ventura download the update all over again and try installing again from start.
I see limit cpu cores...
Updated to OC 0.9.5 with Sonoma 14.0
Note that in order for Wifi to work, find the latest OCLP 0.6.9 (Preview available, Official version to be released Oct 2) and run root patcher.
Can confirm working for both attachments. Feel free to open up the plist, look at the last 2 kernel patch entries, as well as quirk settings.
I’ll soon post the working pkg for 13.3
For the patch.plist that is posted in the current github for AMD kernel— Is it just me or the only the first one has B0 while other 3 has BA. And when you adjust the kernel to BA— for 13.3, I also have to make sure the character length between replace and mask the same?
I did manage to get my...
To those who rely upon ProperTree and are trying to come from OC 0.8.6-- Just add Boolean value of "HibernateSkipsPicker" in Boot section is all you need for config.plist change.
Also, Using BCM94360NG on Windows 11 should work okay nowadays, since the problem posts are quite some time ago, as long as I use either bootcamp drivers or fenvi drivers?
Has anyone noticed that there are 3 differences in BCM94352Z?
1. DW1560 with CN-06XRYC-73614-58K-07WC-A01
2. CN-08XRYC-61531-582-0886-A02
3. "Fenvi" CN-08XRYC-61531-582-3870-A02
Dorthania Wifi Buyer's Guide only mentions 1. and 3. where 3. is "native", and 1. needs all those WiFi and bluetooth...
Totally out of curiosity. Lots of signs that Apple is trying to move away from relying on kexts, especially during Monterey days. Do you think Apple will completely deprecate the use of kexts when they release OS that drops support of x86_64 and going forward with only M processors? Would you...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks some useful and important features of our website. For the best possible site experience please take a moment to disable your AdBlocker.